Representative Must Personally Sign Form 2848

In Chief Counsel Advice 201544024 the Chief Counsel’s office ruled that it was not permissible for one representative on a Form 2848 to sign the Form 2848 on behalf of another representative.

In the case discussed, there were three representatives appointed on the Form 2848 to represent the taxpayer.  However, one of the representatives had not personally signed the form, but rather another representative signed the form “on behalf” of the third representative when the document was completed.

Read More

Acquired Domain Name Costs Are Amortized Over 15 Year Life Per Chief Counsel Advice

The IRS National Office determined that the proper life for amortization of an acquired domain name is 15 years in Chief Counsel Advice 201543014.  That was true whether the domain name was a generic domain name (one that doesn’t refer to a specific company or product name, say “dogfood.com”) or a non-generic domain name (one that is associated with a specific company, product or service name, such as “microsoft.com”).

Read More

Taxpayer Who Developed Residential Land But Did Not Construct Homes Was Not a Homebuilder and Could Not Use Completed Contract Method

In the case of The Howard Hughes Company, LLC v. Commissioner, 142 TC No. 20, the Tax Court clarified the limit of its decision in Shea Homes, Inc. v. Commissioner, 142 TC No.3, denying the completed contract method to a developer that did not actually construct homes in this case.  On appeal, the Fifth Circuit accepted the Tax Court’s analysis (The Howard Hughes Company, LLC v. Commissioner, CA5, Nos. 14-60915, 14-60921, AFTR 2d ¶ 2015-5368).

Read More

Fact Taxpayer Received Full and Adequate Consideration, Not Whether Recipient Provided It, Was Determinative That No Gift Had Taken Place

The summer of 1972 had the break-in at the Watergate office complex in Washington DC on June 17.  While that event is now the subject of history books, an event that took place just over a month later just recently was the featured issue in tax litigation.  In the case of Estate of Redstone v. Commissioner, 145 TC No. 11 the issue became whether or not a gift had taken place back in 1972, a gift the IRS now sought to collect gift tax on.  Since no gift tax return had been filed, the statute remained open for the IRS to assess and attempt to collect the tax it claimed was due.

Read More

Estate Never Had Been Given Advice on Due Date, No Reasonable Cause Found for Late Filing

An estate argued that it should be excused from late filing penalties because it had relied on the advice of an attorney—but the court in the case of West, et al v. Koskinen, 2015 TNT 203-11 (USDC Eastern District Virginia) determined that, in fact, there had been no advice received from the attorney on this matter.

Read More

Taxpayer Fails to Show Procedures in Revenue Procedure 99-17 Followed in Prior Year, No Current Year Use of Mark To Market Allowed for Trading Business

If a taxpayer is a trader and properly elects under IRC §475(f) to use the mark to market treatment, the gains and losses from the trading activity are treated as ordinary, rather than capital, gains and losses.  Of particular significance is that losses in excess of gains will not be subject to a $3,000 annual limitation.

In the case of Poppe v. Commissioner, TC Memo 2015-205 the question at hand was whether, in fact, Mr. Poppe had ever properly made the election in question.

Read More

IRS Announces 2015/2016 PCORI Fee

An annual fee to fund the “Patient Centered Outcome Research Institute” (the PCORI fee) is imposed on either:

  • The issuer of a specified health insurance policy for each policy year ending after September 20, 2012 and before October 1, 2019 [IRC §4375]
  • A sponsor of an applicable self-insured health plan each plan year ending after September 20, 2012 and before October 1, 2019 [IRC §4376]
Read More

No Actual Tax Partnership Existed, All Income Taxable to Entity That Per Agreement Was to Receive 30% of Income

In the case of DJB Holding Corporation v. Commissioner, 116 AFTR 2d ¶ 2015-5313, CA9, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a Tax Court decision that since no partnership existed, the entire income that had been reported on the partnership return should instead be reported on the return of the claimed 30% partner of the operation, a C corporation.

Read More

Non-Compete Agreement Was Not Properly Taxable to Partnership, Since It Bound Corporation and Two Employees Only

While the case of DJB Holding Corporation v. Commissioner, 116 AFTR 2d ¶ 2015-5313, CA9, principally involved the issue of the lack of existence of a purported partnership (which is discussed elsewhere), there was another issue of interest.

The taxpayers in question had sold the assets of a C corporation owned by a partnership that was itself owned by two S corporations that the individuals controlled via ESOPs.  The agreement had provided that $3.4 million of the sales price represented an agreement not to compete.

Read More

Counseling Taxpayer that Suboptimal Tax Laws are Still Valid Tax Laws, Court Upholds Imposition of Payroll Taxes on Deferred Compensation Taxpayer Will Never Receive

The Court of Federal Claims concluded something all of us learned early on—“suboptimal tax laws are still valid tax laws” in upholding the taxation of deferred compensation in 2004 for a taxpayer that was clear even when included in the employee’s income would never be paid in the case of Balestra v. United States, 113 AFTR 2d ¶2014-887.

The taxpayer in this case was a pilot for an airline who retired in 2004.  The airline in question entered bankruptcy in 2002.  In 2004 Mr. Balestra retired from the airline.

Read More

Taxpayer Needs to Choose Paying Tax on Income or Having IRA Overfunded

In IRS Information Letter 2015-0026 a taxpayer discovered that sometimes when the IRS changes its mind in what appears to be a taxpayer favorable fashion, taking advantage of that relief may introduce its own complications, in this case triggering the excess contributions tax of IRC §4973.

In this case the taxpayer had received Medicare waiver payments as a caregiver.  In Notice 2014-7 the IRS had determined that such payments were excludable from income and allowed taxpayers to amend their returns to take advantage of this change in position.

Read More