Keeping CPAs Up to Date on Tax Matters
A site devoted to articles on current developments in federal taxes geared toward CPAs in tax practice.
The North Carolina Department of Revenue issued Directive SD-18-6 that contains the state’s new directive requiring out of state sellers who meet certain de minimis requirement to collect and remit the state’s sales tax.
Image copyright georgejmclittle / 123RF Stock Photo
Read MoreThe taxpayers in the case of Garcia v. Commissioner, TC Summary Op. 2018-38, recognized that expenses related to litigation that arose from an investment in stock in Randgold & Exploration Co., Ltd. (R&E) they had made would only be deductible as IRC §212 expenses. They also recognized that a deduction under that provision would be a miscellaneous itemized deduction subject to the 2% floor imposed on all such deductions in the year in question and not deductible at all in computing their alternative minimum tax liability.
The taxpayers also were aware that if such expenses were an ordinary and necessary trade or business under IRC §162 that was incurred in the trade or business other than that of being an employee, the entire amount of the expense would be deductible in computing their adjusted gross income. As well, the entire amount would also reduce their alternative minimum taxable income.
Image copyright fergregory / 123RF Stock Photo
Read MoreThe IRS in TD 9839 issued the final regulations outlining the rules applicable to the partnership representative under the Centralized Partnership Audit Regime (CPAR). These regulations, found at Reg. §§301.6223-1 and 301.6223-2, outline the qualifications for a representative, how the representative resigns or is removed and the powers of the representative.
The IRS also finalized the regulations on the election to apply the CPAR rules to examinations of years beginning after the enactment of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 but before January 1, 2018. Those regulations, found at Reg. §301.9100-22, were adopted in final form without change and the temporary regulations were removed.
Image copyright choreograph / 123RF Stock Photo
Read MoreProposed regulations to implement the changes to bonus depreciation made by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act have been released by the IRS in REG-104397-18.
The preamble provides that taxpayers may rely upon the proposed regulations until final regulations are issued:
Pending the issuance of the final regulations, a taxpayer may choose to apply these proposed regulations to qualified property acquired and placed in service or planted or grafted, as applicable, after September 27, 2017, by the taxpayer during taxable years ending on or after September 28, 2017.
Some of the key features of the proposed regulations are discussed below.
Image copyright liujunrong / 123RF Stock Photo
Read MoreThe IRS has now issued guidance on how businesses may obtain automatic consent to change accounting methods to use the new “small business” methods contained in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act in Revenue Procedure 2018-40.
Image copyright bleakstar / 123RF Stock Photo
Read MoreThe released Notice 2018-62 that describes regulations the IRS plans to issue to clarify the rules on increased contribution limits to ABLE accounts enacted as part of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.
Image copyright janpietruszk / 123RF Stock Photo
Read MoreIn Notice 2018-58 the IRS clarified various issues related to changes Congress made in the PATH Act and the Tax Cut and Jobs Act to §529 Education Savings Plan (a “qualified tuition program” or QTP).
Taking the oldest change first, the IRS clarified some issues related to the ability of a taxpayer to return funds to a §529 plan if the taxpayer receives a refund of qualified education expenses. As the IRS notes “This could occur, for example, if the beneficiary were to drop a class mid-semester.”
Image copyright zimmytws / 123RF Stock Photo
Read MoreReports today from various sources have noted that a majority of states that impose a sales tax have now put in place requirements for out of state sellers to collect and pay over sales taxes. The dates for beginning enforcement have ranged from July 1 (which means sellers may already be in violation) to January 1, with a number of states looking to begin collection requirements on October 1, 2018.
Image copyright enika / 123RF Stock Photo
Read MoreThe state of Minnesota in a news release announced that it will being enforcing its remote seller sales tax collection statute effective October 1, 2018, as well as its statute requiring certain marketplace providers to collect and remit sales tax.
Image copyright pat138241 / 123RF Stock Photo
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals returned again to the case of Sloan v. Commissioner, CA 9, No. 16-73349, and again disagreed with the Tax Court’s finding in favor of the taxpayer.
This case began with the Tax Court’s opinion in the case of Slone v. Commissioner, TC Memo 2012-57, vacated and remanded, CA9, 2015 TNT 110-18, No. 12-72464, 12-72495, 12-72496, and 12-72497 where the Tax Court rejected the IRS’s argument of substance over form in attempting to recast a sale of a corporation’s stock, following the sale of its assets, as a liquidating distribution to which transferee liability could attach under IRC §6901. But, on appeal, the Ninth Circuit found that Tax Court had not properly considered the issue and sent the matter back to the Tax Court.
Image copyright luismolinero / 123RF Stock Photo
Read MoreYet another U.S. District Court has decided that the IRS must follow the terms of its own regulations and limit the maximum penalty for a willful violation of the FBAR rules to $100,000. In the case of Wadhan v. United States, US DC Colorado, Case No. 1:17-cv-01287, the IRS was limited in the amount of penalty that could be assessed for the same reasons cited by the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas in United States v. Colliot.
Image copyright niroworld / 123RF Stock Photo
Read MoreThe latest state to act to force out of state sellers to collect sales tax is Utah. In a special session, the Utah Legislature passed SB 2001 which conforms the state’s rules requiring out of state sellers to file with Utah with the provisions found in South Dakota’s law.
Utah’s triggers for filing by an out of state seller will conform to South Dakota’s, effective on January 1, 2019. As well, the previous rule that allowed sellers who voluntarily collected Utah tax to retain 18% of the tax collected will be repealed effective on the same date.
Image copyright rawpixel / 123RF Stock Photo
Read MoreThe IRS has published final regulations (TD 9835) that modify the requirements for qualified matching contributions (QMACs) and qualified nonelective contributions (QNECs) for employer retirement plans. These regulations are adopted essentially unchanged from the proposed versions issued in January 2017.
These payments are used to deal with issues that arise when an employer initially runs the ADP and/or ACP tests for a retirement plan and discovers the plan does not comply with one or both tests for the plan year.
Image copyright ileezhun / 123RF Stock Photo
Read MoreWhile most conversations since the Wayfair decision regarding state and local taxes have revolved around an expansion of a state’s ability to impose taxes, the high courts in two states have moved to reduce the state’s ability to impose taxes on income from trusts, finding that the state’s attempts to tax trust income are in violation of the U.S. Constitution.
The North Carolina Supreme Court in the case of Kimberley Rice Kaestner 1992 Family Trust v. Dep’t of Revenue, No. 307PA15-2 and the Minnesota Supreme Court in the case of Fielding v. Comm’r of Revenue, A17-1177 each ruled the respective states had inappropriately attempted to tax the income of the trusts in question.
Image copyright olivier26 / 123RF Stock Photo
Read MoreAn IRS Program Manager Technical Advice (PMTA 2018-013) the Chief Counsel’s office outlined its position on what constitutes willfulness for purposes of imposing the maximum penalty for FBAR reporting violations, as well as the standard of proof that must be established for the IRS to carry the issue of applying the penalty.
Under 31 USC §5321(a)(5)(B) the maximum penalty for an FBAR violation is $10,000 unless the violation is willful. In that case, 31 USC §5321(a)(5)(C) increases the maximum penalty to the greater of $100,000 or 50% of the balance in the account.
Image copyright sifotography / 123RF Stock Photo
Read MoreIn Program Manager Technical Advice 2018-015 the IRS analyzes how to handle the implications to the employee of an examination of an employer where it is determined the employer failed to properly classify fringe benefits received by an individual as taxable wages. Specifically, the guidance looks at whether the employer’s payment of the federal income taxes and FICA not withheld creates income for the employee.
Image copyright rrraum / 123RF Stock Photo
Read MoreThe IRS has issued proposed regulations (REG-103474-18) to implement the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act changes made to IRC §6695(g), expanding the preparer due diligence rules and penalty to cover qualification for head of household filing status.
Congress in recently years has decided that having preparers be required to do more work inquiring about taxpayer’s qualifications for various tax benefits has proven useful, so they have expanded the due diligence from being limited to the earned income tax credit, to cover additional items.
Image copyright alenkasm / 123RF Stock Photo
Read MoreIn Revenue Procedure 2018-38 the IRS announced that tax exempt organizations, other than §501(c)(3) organizations, will no longer be required be required to report the names and addresses of certain donors on Schedule B of Form 990, but will be required to have such information available should the IRS request it. The new rules will take effect for taxable years ending on or after December 31, 2018.
Image copyright dacianlogan / 123RF Stock Photo
Read MoreIn the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), Congress eliminated the ability of individuals to claim miscellaneous itemized deductions beginning with their 2018 income tax returns. In Notice 2018-61 the IRS explains how this rule will impact trusts and estates whose returns are computed in a manner similar to that of individuals, but with some modifications found at IRC §67(e).
Image copyright sebastiangauert / 123RF Stock Photo
Read MoreNorth Dakota, the first state to post an announcement that it planned to force out of state sellers to collect sales tax on the afternoon of the decision in South Dakota v. Wayfair has now officially announced the date for the start of collections. In a release dated July 11, State Tax Commissioner Ryan Rauschenberger indicated that the sellers will be required to collect beginning on October 1, 2018.
Image copyright everythingpossible / 123RF Stock Photo
Read More