In the case of Belair Woods LLC v. Commissioner, TC Memo 2018-159, the Tax Court found that a taxpayer had neither fully nor constructively complied with the documentation requirements for a charitable contribution.  The Court held that this action constituted a failure in compliance despite the taxpayer having received advice from a consultant that an attorney had indicated that providing basis in the case of a contribution was not truly required.  

However, the Court determined that even though the taxpayer’s position was clearly wrong, there was still a possibility the taxpayer might be able to show it had reasonable cause for its failure that could preserve the deduction.  However, whether it had such cause or not must be determined in a later proceeding, since several material facts remained to be shown by the taxpayer to justify its reliance on the information relayed from the attorney.

Image copyright icetray / 123RF Stock Photo

The IRS announced a delay in making major revisions in the Form W-4, announcing in a Treasury Department Press Release that the revised form will be released for 2020, not 2019.

Image copyright grazvydas/123rf.com

The IRS has announced relief from filing deadlines for taxpayers impacted by Hurricane Florence in News Release NC-2018-03.

Image copyright larryrains / 123RF Stock Photo

The state of Colorado has issued emergency rules (Regulation 39-26-102 (1.3); Regulation 39-26-102 (9)) that would impose requirement on out of state sellers to collect Colorado.  The collection would be required effective on November 30, 2018.

Image copyright 123rf.com/esadaphorn Chaiinkeaw 

The key factor to sustaining a taxpayer’s claim to be a real estate professional in cases before the Tax Court generally comes down to whether the taxpayer has sufficient and reliable records to back up their activity.  In the case of Birdsong v. Commissioner, TC Memo 2018-148 the taxpayer’s records were found to be sufficient to sustain her contention that she was a real estate professional.

Image copyright 123rf.com/lkeskinen

In a Project Manager Technical Advice addressed to the IRS Taxpayer Advocate and the Commissioner of the Wage and Investment Division, the Chief Counsel’s office concluded that the IRS can use the math authority to correct errors in the earned income tax credit, child tax credit, additional child tax credit and the American opportunity tax credit even if the return has already been processed and a refund issued (PMTA 2018-017).

Image copyright www.123rf.com/profile_usamedeniz

In what can be called an “interesting” news release (IR-2018-178), the IRS clarified that the proposed regulations that dealt with a required reduction of charitable contributions for state tax credits will not impact deductions claimed for business related payments to charities.

Image copyright 123rf.com/damedeeso

Close only counts in horseshoes and hand grenades as the saying goes--and tax relief provisions are in neither category as the taxpayer in the case of Thompson v. United States, Case No. 3:18-cv-01675, US DC ND CA discovered.  The problem arose over an exception to the 10% premature distribution tax of IRC §72(t) for distributions made on account of a levy under IRC §6331.[1]

The exception, found at IRC §72(t)(2)(A)(vii) provides the early distribution tax does not apply “made on account of a levy under section 6331 on the qualified retirement plan.”

Image copyright viperagp / 123RF Stock Photo

On August 31, 2018 the President signed an executive order entitled “Executive Order on Strengthening Retirement Security in America” that was aimed at increasing the number of employees being offered retirement programs via their employer and to slow the required distributions from such plans.  The order contains instructions for the Department of Labor and Treasury Department to consider various revisions to requirements related to qualified retirement plans.

Image copyright tehcheesiong / 123RF Stock Photo

In CCA 201835004 the question was posed regarding whether seismic surveys information obtained to determine the placement of offshore gas and oil development wells should be treated as geological and geophysical costs, amortizable under §167(h), or as intangible drilling costs, deductible under IRC §263(c).

Image copyright think4photop / 123RF Stock Photo