Seventh Circuit Upholds Imposition of Fraud Penalty for an Overstatement of Withholdings

The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals decided the case of Bachner v. Commissioner, No. 24-1420, on January 7, 2025, which provides a clear illustration of how the IRS and courts handle cases of fraudulent tax returns and the assessment of penalties. This case particularly highlights the complexities surrounding the calculation of underpayments when taxpayers fraudulently overstate their withholdings.

Read More

Taxpayer Found to Have Embezzlement Income from Transactions with Retirement Plans for Which He Was a Fiduciary

Matthew Hutcheson at the very end of 2024 and very beginning of 2025 received both good news and bad news. Mr. Hutcheson, who had been convicted of wire fraud in 2013 and sentenced to 17 years in prison had his remaining sentence commuted by President Biden as part of his end of term pardons and sentence commutations on December 12, 2024. But three days into 2025, Mr. Hutcheson received less upbeat news, as the Tax Court found he owed taxes on the amounts he embezzled that led to those 2013 convictions in the case of Hutcheson v. Commissioner.

Read More

Basis of Digital Assets Sold Cost Flow Assumptions - IRS Releases Temporary Specific Identification Relief for 2025

To close out 2024, the IRS released Revenue Procedure 2025-7 providing temporary relief provisions for allowing taxpayers to specifically identify specific blocks of digital assets sold from a brokerage account in 2025. This relief is in addition to special rules adopted earlier this year in Revenue Procedure 2024-28 for allocating unallocated basis as taxpayers transition to the provisions of Reg. §1.1012-1(j).

Read More

Fifth Circuit Merits Panel Stay on Injunction Against Enforcement of the CTA Vacated After Case Transferred to Merits Panel, BOI Enforcement Back on Hold

On December 26, 2024, an order was issued vacating a previous stay that had been granted regarding the enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) and its corresponding Reporting Rule. The stay had been granted by a motions panel of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals on December 23, 2024, but was vacated by the merits panel of the same court. The order vacating the stay was made to “preserve the constitutional status quo while the merits panel considers the parties’ weighty substantive arguments”

Read More

Request for an En Banc Rehearing on Stay of Injunction in BOI Case Filed

The plaintiffs in Texas Top Cop Shop, Inc., et al. v. Merrick Garland, Attorney General of the United States, et al. are requesting an en banc rehearing based on several arguments related to the panel decision to grant a stay of the district court’s preliminary injunction. The plaintiffs contend that the panel decision conflicts with Supreme Court precedent, improperly weighed the equities, and failed to consider key aspects of the case.

Read More

Plaintiffs in Texas Top Cop Shop, Inc. BOI Case File a Petition for an En Banc Rehearing on the Injunction Ruling

As reported by Reuters yesterday, the plaintiffs in the Texas Top Cop Shop, Inc. case are filing a petition for an en banc rehearing of the matter by the entire Fifth Circuit. They are asking for a decision by January 6, 2025.

Plaintiffs-Appellees’ Emergency Petition for Rehearing En Banc - Texas Top Cop Shop, Inc.

Tax Court Again Finds That a Functional Test Must be Applied to State Law Limited Partners for the Exclusion from Self-Employment Income Under IRC §1402(a)(13)

The Tax Court’s decision in Denham Capital Management LP v. Commissioner, TC Memo 2024-114 addresses whether a state law limited partner’s distributive share of partnership income is subject to self-employment tax. The court concluded that the partners were not “limited partners, as such” under section 1402(a)(13), and their distributive shares were included in the partnership’s net earnings from self-employment (NESE). This conclusion is consistent with the court’s prior ruling in Soroban Capital Partners LP v. Commissioner, 161 T.C. 310 (2023), which held that a partner’s status as a limited partner for purposes of the limited partner exception is determined by a functional analysis of their roles and responsibilities, not solely on their state law designation

Read More

FinCEN Grants Additional Extension of Time to File BOI Reports for Certain Entities Following Fifth Circuit Ruling

Following the Fifth Circuit’s stay of the injunction against the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA), FinCEN extended the reporting deadlines for beneficial ownership information. These extensions were implemented because the Department of the Treasury recognized that companies might need additional time to comply due to the period when the preliminary injunction was in effect.

Read More

Injunction Against Enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act Lifted, January 1, 2025 Initial Filing Deadline for Most Effected Entities Back in Place

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals on December 23, 2024 issued an order[^1] staying the nationwide injunction issued by the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas blocking enforcement of the Corporate Transparency. Thus, entities in existence on January 1, 2024 will be required to have filed their BOI report by January 1, 2024 unless they qualify for an exemption.

Read More

Ninth Circuit Affirms Tax Court, Ruling that All Events Test Was Not Met

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, in a split decision, upheld[^1] the Tax Court’s holding in the case of The Morning Star Packing Co. LP et al. v. Commissioner, TC Memo 2020-142 that the all events test had not been met by a taxpayer with respect to costs to restore, rebuild, recondition, and retest their manufacturing facilities recorded at the end of the taxpayers’ tomato products packaging season.

Read More

IRS Proposes Changes to Circular 230

The IRS has issued proposed regulations[1] that would revise Circular 230, removing provisions found at sections 10.3 through 10.6 of the current Circular 230 that related to the regulation of registered return preparers, clarify that practice before the IRS includes “preparation and submission of tax returns in connection with representing a client in a matter before the IRS,” eliminate Section 10.27 of the current Circular 230 that bars the acceptance of contingent fees (but now making accepting such fees disreputable conduct in certain situations), expand the definition of competency to include requiring that a federally authorized tax practitioner (FATP) must maintain certain minimum qualifications of technological competency related to tax practice as well as make additional changes.

Unless otherwise provided for in the proposed regulations, these regulations would become effective 30 days after being published in final form in the Federal Register.[2]

Read More

Tax Court Requires Adjustment of Basis of a Partnership Interest to Include Consideration of Deductions Claimed in Prior Years Closed to Adjustment That Were in Excess of Basis

In the matter of Surk LLC v. Commissioner,[1] the Tax Court was presented with the question of basis computations related to an interest in a partnership. In a tax year that is now closed for assessment, the taxpayer mistakenly deducted losses that exceeded the limitation set forth in Internal Revenue Code Section 704(d). The central issue is whether the taxpayer should reduce its basis in subsequent years by the amount of those disallowed losses or should compute the basis by treating those losses as if they were never deducted.

Read More

Taxpayer Advocate Publishes Blog Page Outlining Options for Taxpayers Who Received Notice of Disallowance on ERC Claims

On August 21, 2024, the National Taxpayer Advocate issued a statement on the Employee Retention Credit in the form of a blog post.[1] This statement aimed to provide taxpayers with comprehensive information regarding the subsequent procedures for those who have recently received a Notice of Disallowance for their Employee Retention Credit (ERC) claim. Additionally, the statement addressed perceived issues within the process currently and prospectively employed by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) for these claims.

Read More